Zimbabwe, another sad lesson for Africa
Africa is on the news again. This time around for the negative reasons. Elements in the Zimbabwe Defence Forces in the evening of 14th November gathered in the nation's capital, Harare and seized some major institutions in the city, including Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation. Though the military have denied any coup intentions, political pundits are yet to come to terms with the intentions of the military seizing major institutions in the capital, and placing the president under house arrest.
The Zimbabwe experience is one out of multiple situations where tendencies for serving African leaders to perpetuate themselves in power have generated tensions which have degenerated to either full blown wars or civil unrest. It is either the politics is partitioned along ethnic lines or the serving leader would want to perpetuate himself in power, cede power to either his spouse or ward when he is quitting the stage.
Africa is yet to recover from the Kenyan political imbroglio when another political upheaval erupted in Zimbabwe. In Kenya, politics is defined by ethnic tensions. This characteristic has been a major feature of Kenyan politics since the country achieved independence in 1963. The situation came to a head when in 2007 tribalism was so played up that over 1,000 persons lost their lives and thousands of others displaced internally after national elections that were vehemently disputed. Since then, Kenya has remained a fragile political environment.
Today, emphasis and attention are shifting to Zimbabwe, where the African longest- serving despot, Robert Mugabe has held sway since 1980. Mugabe is a classical study in perpetuity in power. Tensions in Zimbabwe is brewed by who would succeed this 93- year old despot in power between two major contenders, embattled Vice- President, Emmerson Mnangagwa, who is allegedly backed by the army, and Mugabe's spouse, Grace Mugabe, who is allegedly backed by the G40 faction.
In Zimbabwe recently, it has been intrigues and power play. A situation that led to the firing of the Mnangagwa and subsequent forced exile to South Africa.Their has been rumoured poisoning of Mnangagwa during an August 2017 political rally led by the president and his airlifting to a hospital in South Africa for treatment. Though Mnangagwa pledged his loyalty to the ZANU–PF party and President Mugabe, adding that "the story spread by his supporters that Grace Mugabe had ordered the poisoning via a dairy farm she controlled was untrue", Grace Mugabe was not satisfied with Mnangagwa's refutal as she describes Mnangagwa's poisoning claims as ridiculous and rhetorically, stressing that his comments about the August incident were part of an attempt to weaken the country, the power of the president, and divide ZANU–PF, since doctors had actually concluded that stale food was to blame. The jostle on who succeeds Mugabe has become intense that Grace Mugabe claims that her
supporters were constantly receiving threats that if Mnangagwa did not succeed Mugabe, they would be killed and that the faction backing Mnangagwa was plotting a coup d'état.Mnangagwa was also alleged of consistently and persistently exhibited traits of disloyalty, disrespect, deceitfulness and unreliability.
The situation in Zimbabwe has divided political interests along lines. Mnangagwa has the strong support of the Zimbabwean army who insisted that only a veteran of the war for independence would succeed Mugabe. It will be recalled that Mnangagwa was one of Mugabe's last political allies who had stayed with him since independence in 1980.
The Zimabwean army had earlier fired a warning shot when during a press conference on 13 November, the Army Chief , General Constantino Chiwenga had warned during a press conference at the military headquarters that the army would intervene if their historical political allies continued to be targeted. While he described recent events treacherous shenanigans, and said that the military will not hesitate to step in if that was necessary to protect the Zimbabwean revolution.Chiwenga, while urging people to attend the December 2017 ZANU–PF party congress to exercise their democratic rights and that the party had been infiltrated by counter-revolutionaries, said that the infighting and purges in ZANU–PF had led to chaos and that no meaningful development in the country for the past five years.
The situation in Zimbabwe has generated mixed reactions. A section of political analysts are not comfortable with the excuses offered by the army- " that they were targeting criminals around Mugabe responsible for the country's socio-economic problems, and that after they achieved their aims, the situation would return to normalcy"- as a valid and genuine claim for striking. This is because of the antecedent of the military in intervening in power in Africa.
On various occasions, the military in Africa have offered reasons of bringing normalcy to the political system as a basis for their intervention in politics and afterward they perpetuate themselves in power. A strong has gone to the Zimbabwean army to utilise this opportunity to supervise and midwife a transparent and credible transition process in Zimbabwe to ensure that a deomcratically- elected leader is enthroned in Zimbabwe. The same appeal goes to the Africa Union (AU).
This is also an ample opportunity for African leaders to have a rethink and shed any tendencies to perpetuate themselves in power. The sit-tight syndrome had in the past plunged most African leaders into untold disaster and should be discouraged.