Ex-JAMB Registrar, Dibu Ojerinde Drags ICPC To Court Over Unlawful Arrest
A former registrar of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB), Dibu Ojerinde, has instituted a suit against the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) for unlawful arrest.
It would be recalled that the former JAMB registrar has been under investigation by the anti-corruption agency since 2020.
In April 2020, ICPC obtained an interim forfeiture of some of Ojerinde’s assets which were said to be proceeds of crime.
In March 2021, Ojerinde was arrested by the ICPC for allegedly misappropriating N900 million, and on July 6, 2021, the former JAMB boss was in court on an 18-count charge bordering on alleged misappropriation of funds to the tune of N5.2 billion while in office.
On January 2023, Ojerinde was re-arrested by the ICPC in Abuja at the premises of a Federal High Court.
On February 15, ICPC lawyer, Ebenezer Shogunle, told the court that Ojerinde was re-arrested on suspicion that he might have committed some other offences that might relate to the present charges before the court.
Shogunle said the agency had “obtained a warrant from the court dated December 6, 2022” for the ex-JAMB registrar’s re-arrest.
Meanwhile, Eteya Ogana, Ojerinde’s lawyer, disagreed with Shogunle on his client’s re-arrest.
Ogana said on the last adjourned date after the proceeding, the operatives of ICPC intercepted them and took Ojerinde away under the guise that they were inviting him for an explanation.
The lawyer said his client had been in the commission’s custody since the re-arrest.
Ogana said despite that Ojerinde did not breach the bail terms, they were not served with the warrant before he was re-arrested.
The lawyer argued that if there were uncovered evidence against his client, ICPC was at liberty to file additional proof of evidence and not to re-arrest him.
Following his arrest, Ojerinde filed a suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/179/2023 against ICPC before Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja.
He sought an order to enforce his fundamental rights, following his re-arrest on January 26 and his subsequent detention.
The matter, however, could not proceed due to the governorship and state assembly election break granted to the judges.
While Ojerinde’s suit was adjourned until May 4 for the mention, his trial was fixed for the same date for hearing continuation.