TheNigerianVoice Online Radio Center

Truth, Spoken To Authority

Click for Full Image Size
Listen to article

Before Nigerians voted for change in 2015, the country was beleaguered with a cold war that had raged for over two decades between the northern military power blocks and western civil rights activism. The war was rooted in what most Western Nigerians saw as the injustice of the Northern ruling cabal which acquired expression in the annulment of the June 12, 1993 polls after one of their own, the late Chief Moshood Abiola, had been declared winner in a Presidential election that was widely accepted, locally and internationally, as free and fair.

Eventually, when General Muhammadu Buhari, a hard core ex-military officer from the North and Professor Yemi Osinbajo, a renowned legal luminary from the West paired up as Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates for the then opposition All Progressives Congress, APC, many Nigerians, tired of the cold war and clamouring for change, believed in the capability of the pair to deliver the desired change. So, they massively voted the duo into the two highest public offices in the land.

Today, barely 100 days after they were sworn into office, Nigerians generally seem more confident than when they cast their votes that Buhari and Osinbajo will deal with at-least the major problems which have continued to glaringly stare the citizenry in the face with the expediency they deserve. It will be needless to say that the way and manner in which the administration gets about tackling these challenges will be a very important pointer, not only to the direction it is piloting the nation, but also to the possible success or failure of the APC government.

Initially, there had been speculations that the Buhari administration would go the way of so many other administrations before it. In the past, for instance, the first thing any new government would do was to saddle itself with the onerous task of retrieving money stolen by the previous administration. At the end of the day, when all was said and done, one major characteristic stood out clearly: Nigerians were not really bothered about where all the retrieved money went into afterwards. Not that they would care now, any more than they cared in the past.

Experience has shown that they are not so much interested in retrieved stolen money that ended up, as usual, in the pockets of the shot-calling politicians of the day as they are in wanting to see transparency at work in the decisions and actions of the government in power.

Nigerians voted for change. They want to see that change come through an enhanced quality of administration by their new leaders who took over from the past government. In the opinion of most Nigerians, that would be the sort of change they should look up to in the Buhari administration.

To that extent, I think, President Buhari is poised to prove his mettle, the way he has gone about the probe of those who were so close enough to President Jonathan as to exploit his softness to their selfish advantage.

There are strong indicators to the fact that this government is committed to allaying the fears of Nigerian citizens along certain lines. In the past, for instance, leaders in a new government were known to have used the anti-graft agencies to witch-hunt their political “enemies”. 100 days is yet early in the morning for Nigerians to be able to adequately assess the APC government. Yet many Nigerians are already happy with the way the administration is going about.

No one expects the administration to begin to show signs of military toughness or super-strength, either now or in the future. No. What every well meaning Nigerian is backing up is that for the Buhari administration to meet the expectations of Nigerians in the change they desire, it should continue to learn from the mistakes of its predecessor, build upon those mistakes and deliver from that knowledge. The Buhari administration should appreciate this fact. It is the truth, spoken to authority.

When Jonathan was there, he inherited and had to deal with many problems, just as the new administration is expected to do. Those challenges were there before President Jonathan was elected into office. And he dealt with them as much as he was able to do during his one-term tenure. Some of them will definitely be inherited by the Buhari administration. He, too, will be expected to deal with them to the best of his ability. No one expects all of the country’s problems to be solved under one government or under one term of office.

In the South-South of the country, for instance, disparity in the formula for sharing revenue accruing from oil exploration between the federal government and ethnic groups of the Niger Delta region had given birth to armed resistance in the Niger Delta area. It didn’t start with Jonathan’s administration. It may not end with Buhari’s government.

It had indeed been the hope of many Nigerians that a President coming from the Delta Region would be in a better position to resolve the unrest that festered the region, the land in which the greater volume of Nigeria’s oil wealth came from. Unfortunately, President Jonathan's rule could not see to the end of the violent social conflicts that prevailed in the Delta Region. In fact, tension escalated in the region, especially when twelve Northern states decided to entirely embrace Sharia laws in a robust attempt to contain the power shift represented by the election of a Delta man as President.

In a spirited attempt to come to terms with the security challenges that were beginning to envelope the country at the time, such armed militias as the Oduah People's Congress, OPC, in the South-West; the Movement for the Realisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra, MASSOB in the South-East and Arewa People's Congress, APC, in the North sprang up in defence of ethnic interests. Even as we speak, the rumblings of these regional “defenders of the faith” are still making ripples in the daily social life of many Nigerians, waiting for the Buhari administration to address them.

Judging from one recent development, it would appear that the Buhari administration has once again put the right foot forward. If the commendation of a former Federal Commissioner for Information and prominent South-South leader, Chief Edwin Clark, of the administration’s appointment of retired Brigadier-General Paul Boroh as the new co-ordinator of the Amnesty programme is any standard to come by, then the Buhari administration must be on the right path. Boroh’s appointment, Chief Clark said, would avert a major breakdown of law and order which would have engulfed the Niger Delta region with time.

Nigerians are anxious to see that President Buhari’s team is effecting the desired changes that the President and his party promised them through how they handle some of these more fundamental challenges that confront the nation. For instance, the ceding of oil wells purportedly belonging to Abia and Rivers states to Bayelsa state was a source of political tension for years during the Jonathan administration. No one knows yet how the Buhari administration intends to resolve that problem.

In the same vein, the ceding of some Nigerian oil-rich lands in Bakassi to Cameroon by the International Court at The Hague equally created its own tension and, even now, some Nigerians who live within the territory continue to express their unhappiness that their true nationality was “stolen” from them.

Disputes over land ownerships in the Middle Belt region remains a serious source of conflict in the country. Between the Hausa and the Fulani, increasing conflicts over land and grazing rights for cattle was a headache for the Federal government of Dr Jonathan. The Buhari administration will find itself increasingly facing this lingering problem. And so, it should begin early to find a lasting solution to it, if it can.

Dangerous religious clashes between Muslim and Christian communities, especially in some states of the North-East do not seem to have mellowed down in the past 100 days. Almost every week, stories are told of how Christians were mowed down in their dozens by the bombs, bullets and machetes of unrelenting Muslims who sometimes kill even their own fellow Muslims in suicide attacks that don't know and don't care to know who is a Christian and who is a Muslim. There is no evidence that the tempo of wanton destruction is ameliorating in any way.

The Boko Haram insurgency continues to make the lives of Nigerians a nightmare in the North while in the South, the menace of armed robbers, kidnappers, cultists and ritualists has continued to make many Nigerians sleep at night with their eyes wide open!

It is important for the Buhari administration to understand the magnitude of the security challenges that it is going to face. Those challenges were part of what Dr Jonathan inherited and tried to deal with dispassionately.

Just before his demise in Yola, the Adamawa State capital, the late deputy governor of Borno state, Alhaji Zannah Umar Mustapha, gave the condition for the Federal government to negotiate with Boko Haram. Welcoming the idea of negotiation, he said it should only be if the insurgents agree to lay down their arms for peace. He said nothing short of this should be accepted by the Federal Government. “If the insurgents are tired and they want true and sincere negotiations, it is left to the Federal Government to accept or reject their advances, depending on the genuineness of their approach to these incessant, insane massive killings and bombings in Nigeria, including schools, markets and hospitals.” That was a well thought-out, harmless opinion of a man who was in a position to know.

But Nigerians are no fools. They still remember that at the time Mohammed Yusuf, the slain founder of Boko Haram, was apprehended and detained, he was said to have told the Nigerian law enforcement agencies that they could kill him, the messenger, but they would never be able to kill the message. He sounded tough and certain at the time. But today, it is difficult to see him as he saw himself when the insurgency first raised its ugly head up. The reason is because Boko Haram has now become split in his focus, its ambition and its components. The Buhari administration must capitalise on this opportunity – for that is what it is – an opportunity.

Boko Haram camps are seriously fragmented at least into two irreconcilable segments, and while the mission of one section is politically motivated, the mission of the other is to take advantage of the porous security situations in the country and its neighbourhoods to sack the people from their ancestral homes and with arms, rob them of food and their beautiful daughters. It is a case of the disadvantaged taking advantage of the advantaged.

The Buhari administration will need to evaluate these two segments of the insurgency more closely to fully understand what the Federal government of Dr Jonathan was into, and to learn from his mistakes. APC leaders need to come to grips with the hard fact that there are two different missions of the Boko Haram insurgency.

It is important to note that because Boko Haram camps are fragmented, anyone who claims to be speaking for Boko Haram cannot claim to be speaking for all of its members. Developments during the Jonathan administration proved that fact. It was for that reason that the government of Dr Jonathan was unable to negotiate with the insurgents. The Buhari administration should not make the same mistake of trying to “negotiate” with any purported representatives of Boko Haram. Any attempt to negotiate with them will be like pouring water into a broken calabash.

It is also important to note that Mohammed Yusuf’s religious and political goal was to create an Islamic state in the North of Nigeria, and if possible convert the entire Nigerian nation into an Islamic country. He had a tall dream. And judging from the way Boko Haram has metamorphosed into a hydra-headed monster within its few years of existence, it is obvious that its members are not working in isolation. The group is known to be linked to other organisations with a similar mission. Part of that mission is to hate Western education. It is to hate Western culture. It is to hate Democracy.

The irony of all this is that everything these insurgents are using in the propagation of their nefarious campaign, from mobile phones to sophisticated guns and from vehicles to bombs was the result of Western education. But even at that, many people still accuse the Nigerian government of being the reason for the insurgency, in the first place. Some say the insurgency came into being because development in the North had been neglected for a long while. The question is: by whom was it neglected?

Among all the 15 Heads of State who have administered Nigeria since its independence in 1960, two came from the West, and three came from the East while eight came from the North.

From the West, General Olusegun Obasanjo was Head of State for 3 years and 258 days from 16 January 1976 to 1st October 1979 when he voluntarily relinquished office and again for 8 years from 29 May 1999 to 29 May 2007.

Chief Ernest Shonekan was Head of State for only 83 days from 26 August to 17 November 1993.

From the East, Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe was ceremonial Head of State for 2 years and 107 days from 1stOctober 1963 to 16 January 1966. Azikiwe was deposed in a military coup.

General Aguiyi Ironsi became Head of State for 177 days, from 16 January 1966 to 12 July 1966. He was assassinated in a military counter-coup.

Dr Goodluck Jonathan was Head of State for 5 years and 25 days from 5 May 2010 to 29 May 2015. He conceded defeat to the incumbent President at the 2015 elections.

From the North, General Yakubu Gowon was Head of State for 8 years and 362 days from 1stAugust 1966 to 29

July 1975. Gowon was ousted in a military coup.
General Murtala Muhammed was Head of State for 199 days, from 29 July to 13 February 1976. Muhammed was assassinated in a military coup.

Alhaji Shehu Shagari was Head of State for 4 years and 91 days from 1st October 1979 to 31st December 1983. He was ousted in a military coup.

General Muhammadu Buhari who is the current President was the Head of State for one year and 239 days from 31stDecember 1983 to 27 August 1985. He too was ousted in another military coup.

General Ibrahim Babangida was Head of State for 7 years and 364 days from 27 August 1985 to 26 August 1993. Babangida was also ousted in a military coup.

General Sani Abacha was Head of State for 4 years and 203 days from 17 November 1993 to 8 June 1998. Abacha died in office.

General Abdulsalami Abubakar was Head of State for 355 days from 8 June 1998 to 29 May 1999. He voluntarily relinquished office.

Alhaji Umaru Musa Yar ‘Adua was Head of State for 2 years and 341 days from 29 May 2007 to 5 May 2010. Yar ‘Adua died in office.

This means that for the 55 years Nigeria has had independence, the Easterners have ruled for about 8 years, the Westerners for about 12 years and the Northerners for about 35 years.

But rather than concentrate on issues that would bind the various ethnic groups in the country more closely together, instead of bridging the gap between the extremely rich families and the extremely poor ones across the country, these leaders kept accumulating so much money for their families. The masses of the people began to wonder if those who claimed to have wrestled independence from the British actually did so for the love of their country or for the benefit of their own families and friends. That has remained the general impression on which hinges one of the most important changes that Nigerians look up to in this dispensation. Nigerians will continue to need that reassurance that the Buhari government is there to serve the interest of those who voted it into public office.

From the look of things in the North-East, for instance, it is likely that poverty alleviation measures are what will be needed to placate the mainstream of the Boko Haram insurgency and restore their sense of humanism which they must have lost a long time ago. In that case, the Buhari Administration should realise that education is the key to poverty alleviation. When young Nigerian Muslims are educated, they will be able to think for themselves. They will cease to be vulnerable to cheap and dangerous religious indoctrinations. They will be able to stand against anyone trampling on their fundamental human rights. They will be able to get the government to create jobs for school leavers in need of jobs. They will even be able to create jobs for themselves, should the need arise.

Therefore, it is important for them to acquire the right skills. Yes. Muslim education can teach Nigerian Muslims how to live the good life. It will teach them how to be good wives and authoritative husbands. But only science and technology will teach them how to make money in this Information Age. That knowledge is what Northern Nigerian children need in this Computer Age. To be Computer Literate is to acquire Western education. Therefore, the APC government should please explain to Northern leaders that this was why Dr Jonathan built so many Almajiri schools in the North, to take young Nigerian children off the streets and give them a more meaningful life that is teleguided by education.

It is no use to them that the rich families are getting richer by the day while the poorer families merely exist. That is why Nigerians voted for change. And as much as possible, they want to see these changes take place during this administration’s life time.

At another level of the conflict which ex-Senate President and former minister, Dr Iyorcha Ayu addressed at the 5th Convocation Lecture of Adekunle Ajasin University, the Buhari administration should also note that the oil wealth beneath the Chad Basin is equally fanning the embers of the insurgency in North-East Nigeria. Lake Chad Basin is estimated to have a reserve of 2.32 billion barrels of oil, and 14.65 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

To push up its production levels, a country like Chad is alleged to be tapping oil within its territory and also from Nigerian territory. Prominent businessmen and politicians in both Nigeria and Chad, in association with French oil companies, are said to have invested heavily in oil and gas exploration and exploitation within the area. These businessmen are said to be the principal financiers of, and arms suppliers to, members of this segment of Boko Haram. The group’s destabilization of North-East Nigeria is said to benefit these investors because it delays exploration and production on the Nigerian side of Lake Chad.

These situations probably account for why Boko Haram is known to be made up of Nigerians and a large number of Chadians from the provinces of Lac and Hadjer Lamis which share a long border with North-East Nigeria around the Lake Chad region and provide Boko Haram with trained Chadian fighters.

Also, the drying up of Lake Chad, once the largest water body in Africa, is affecting the economic and social lives of over 30 million people in the seven countries around the lake. It has resulted in the migration of many farmers and herdsmen. It has engineered local conflicts between Cameroonian and Nigerian nationals. For instance, the fishermen are known to have been fighting farmers and herdsmen in an attempt to stop them from diverting water from the lake to their farms and livestock. The drying up of the lake and subsidiary rivers has also created a large population of unemployed and discontented youth who have become a reserve army easily available for recruitment into Boko Haram.

The Buhari administration must make it a priority to investigate all of these issues and take the necessary steps to rectify any anomalies. It will help the administration as it constructs a meaningful roadmap for the nation’s development, and as The Peoples’ General continues from where Dr Jonathan stopped to lead Nigeria through the Apian Way of true democracy.

* Chief Sir Asinugo is a London-based journalist and editor of Trumpet newspaper.

Disclaimer: "The views/contents expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of Emeka Asinugo and do not necessarily reflect those of The Nigerian Voice. The Nigerian Voice will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article."

Articles by Emeka Asinugo