African Union: Reject Immunity for Leaders / African Groups say Plan Would Harm Regional Court

By Human Right Watch (HRW)
Click for Full Image Size

JOHANNESBURG, South-Africa, May 12, 2014/African Press Organization (APO)/ -- A proposal to give immunity to sitting government leaders before Africa's regional court would be a major setback for justice for grave crimes, African organizations from 19 countries and international organizations with a presence in Africa said in a letter to African governments released today.

Justice ministers and attorney generals of African Union (AU) member countries are scheduled to meet in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on May 15 and16, 2014, to consider a draft protocol to expand the authority of the African Court on Justice and Human Rights to include criminal jurisdiction over genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. A proposal providing immunity for heads of state and senior government officials from prosecution for such crimes is being considered as part of the amended protocol.

“Exempting sitting heads of state and senior government officials from African Court jurisdiction on grave crimes would shield the powerful from the reach of the law,” said Sulemana Braimah, executive director of the Media Foundation for West Africa. “This is fundamentally at odds with the AU Constitutive Act, which rejects impunity.”

The consideration of the draft protocol comes at a time of intense opposition to the International Criminal Court (ICC) by some African leaders, particularly in the face of the ICC's proceedings against Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto, who were later elected as Kenya's president and vice president.

“Impunity remains one of the biggest threats to human rights protection in Africa,” said Thuso Ramabolu, human rights officer at Lesotho's Transformation Resource Centre. “It's crucial for people responsible for mass atrocities to face justice, irrespective of their official positions. Immunity poses grave alarm and would create an incentive to hold on to power indefinitely.”

International conventions, including the Convention against Torture, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, and the Geneva Conventions of 1949 recognize the imperative of accountability for grave crimes irrespective of the title or position of those responsible. The irrelevance of official capacity before international criminal courts has become entrenched in international law since the post-World War II trials before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg.

Immunity with respect to serious crimes is also barred before some domestic courts in Africa.

“Even domestic law in Kenya and South Africa bars immunity for sitting officials before domestic courts on grave crimes,” said Stella Ndirangu, program manager at the Kenyan Section of the International Commission of Jurists. “African governments should not roll back important progress in ensuring perpetrators can be held to account.”

The following groups endorsed the letter and are among the most active members of an informal network of African nongovernmental organizations and international organizations with a presence in Africa that have been working on Africa and the International Criminal Court:

Amnesty International, Benin

Burundi Coalition on the International Criminal Court, Burundi

Action des Chrétiens Activistes des Droits de l'Homme à Shabunda, Democratic Republic of Congo

Ligue pour la Paix, les Droits de l'Homme et la Justice, Democratic Republic of Congo

Parliamentarians for Global Action, Democratic Republic of Congo

Synergie des ONGs Congolaise pour le Lutte contre les Violences Sexuelles, Democratic Republic of Congo

Synergie des ONGs Congolaises pour les Victimes, Democratic Republic of Congo

Voix des Sans Voix pour les Droits de l'Homme, Democratic Republic of Congo

Women's Initiative for Gender Justice, Egypt and Uganda

Amnesty International, Ghana

Media Foundation for West Africa, Ghana

La Rencontre Africaine pour la Défense des Droits de l'Homme, Guinea and Senegal

Amnesty International, Kenya

International Commission of Jurists, Kenya

Kenya Human Rights Commission, Kenya

Kenyans for Peace with Truth and Justice, Kenya

Transformation Resource Centre, Lesotho

Rights and Rice Foundation, Liberia

Civil Liberties Committee, Malawi

Center for Human Rights and Rehabilitation, Malawi

NamRights, Namibia

Civil Resource and Development Documentation Center, Nigeria

Coalition of Eastern NGOs, Nigeria

Gender and Constitution Reform Network, Nigeria

National Coalition on Affirmative Action, Nigeria

Nigerian Coalition on the International Criminal Court, Nigeria

Women Advocates' Research and Documentation Center, Nigeria

West African Bar Association, Nigeria

Amnesty International, Senegal

TrustAfrica, Senegal

Amnesty International, Sierra Leone

Centre for Accountability and Rule of Law, Sierra Leone

Coalition for Justice and Accountability, Sierra Leone

International Crime in Africa Programme, Institute for Security Studies, South Africa

Children's Education Society, Tanzania

Amnesty International, Togo

Human Rights Network, Uganda

Uganda Coalition on the International Criminal Court, Uganda

Southern African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes, Zambia

Coalition for the International Criminal Court, with offices in Benin and the Democratic Republic of the Congo

International Federation for Human Rights, with offices in Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea, Kenya, and Mali

Human Rights Watch, with offices in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Rwanda, and South Africa

To read the letter, please visit:

www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/05/joint-civil-society-letter-draft-protocol-amendments-protocol-statute-african-court-

To see other initiatives by these organizations, please visit:

http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/11/12/call-african-icc-states-parties-affirm-support-icc-assembly-states-parties-session

and:

http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/10/04/letter-foreign-ministers-support-icc-advance-extraordinary-au-summit