TheNigerianVoice Online Radio Center

Akwa Ibom Indigenes Fault Cross River's Claims On 76 Oil wells

Source: thewillnigeria.com
Listen to article

UYO, June 23, (THEWILL) - The people of Mbo local government area of Akwa Ibom State have strongly condemned Thursday’s protest by indigenes of the ceded Bakassi peninsular, describing it as uncalled for and part of an orchestrated propaganda aimed at confusing the public.

A group of people had staged a peaceful demonstration in Calabar, Cross River State, over the disputed 76 oil wells on which the Supreme Court is billed to deliver judgment on 10th July, 2012.

Reacting to the protest, a socio-cultural group in Mbo local government area of Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, the Ibaka Development Organisation (IDO) observed that the demonstration by the purported indigenes of Bakassi was a cheap blackmail sponsored to whip sentiments ahead of the Supreme Court ruling on the case instituted by the Cross River State government.

IDO Chairman, Engr. Asuquo Ating told newsmen that the protest was unwarranted since the facts of the ownership of the oil wells are clear, and locate the wells within Akwa Ibom territory.

He reasoned that since the case is still in court, it was totally wrong for the people to start making unnecessary comments in an attempt to influence the proceedings of the court.

Engr. Ating recalled that the Supreme Court had in 2004 decided, in a similar case brought by Cross River State, that Cross River was no longer a littoral state with the ceding of Bakassi peninsular to Cameroon and therefore cannot benefit from the 13 per cent derivation funds.

He said those who participated in the demonstrated were not Nigerians as the said group still parading themselves as indigenes of Bakassi were stopped from participating in the last 2011 general elections in the country.

Ating stressed that the people of Cross River State should be thankful to Akwa Ibom State for allowing more than N600 million to be drawn monthly from the allocation of the Akwa Ibom State government and paid to Cross River State government under the guise of ‘effect of oil exploration on the environment,’ wondering why the people of the area are trading ‘half truths.’

On the status of the puported Bakassi indigenes, Ating argued that the issue of Bakassi returnees should be of greater concern to Akwa Ibom State than any1one else, pointing out that since the peninsular was ceded to Cameroon about 10 years ago, the brunt of managing returnees had been of greater concern to Akwa Ibom, which had larger number of citizens residing there.

“There is no need to heat up the polity through irrelevant demonstrations, as it is not going to affect the position or decision of the court on the case,” he said.

A source close to the legal team of Akwa Ibom State in the Supreme Court said the state government is relying mostly on the judgement earlier delivered by the same Supreme Court in the case of Attorney General of Cross River State Versus Attorney General of the Federation.

In the said judgment, the Supreme Court had held inter alia that “in considering the merit of the plaintiff’s case, it is important to bear in mind the effect of the judgment of International Court of Justice date October 10th, 2002 ....with the result that Cross River no longer has a seaward boundary.