Zoning of elective offices is destructive! It fosters disunity -Lanre Banjo

Source: africanexaminer.com

One serious question facing all Nigerians today is whether it is helpful or destructive to zone

our country for political leadership. It is a salient challenge, yet it presents such enormous

implications for our national development and existence that the question must be tackled in

a resolute way. The ruling party at the federal level, the People's Democratic Party (PDP),

has ruled that zoning is their lifeblood, a winning prescription that cannot be done without.

However, we must ask ourselves if zoning is lawful, right, helpful and desirable to our nation

before it stymies or destroys the democratic society we fought hard to win.

Zoning is an undemocratic formula used by political parties to share power according to

loosely-defined geographic 'zones' that are neither clearly explained nor sanctioned by the

electorates. It is used to goad the citizens and railroad them into perpetual subservience to

political elites. Zoning has become so tightly integrated into our political structure that it is

being applied to all levels of representation today. A zone could be a ward, a constituency, a

town, a section of a state, an ethnic group, a state or national region, depending on the

office in contention. The periodic restriction of political opportunity to selected groups in a

political entity, no matter the intention behind it, is dangerous and divisive. It promotes

mediocre performance among the elected, hinders community development and becomes a

catalyst for rigging elections. At this point of our democratic development, our focus should

be on protecting our people and unifying our nation. Our eyes should be centered on

electing people of good character, intelligence, drive, and vision who are prepared to

perform and bring gains of democracy to the people.

As a gubernatorial candidate in Ogun State, I have been confronted by this question and

have never shied away from presenting my views. Those views, which I have shared with my

constituents, have now become so relevant to our national development that I have decided

to challenge people of good conscience at all strata of the society to weigh in on this

question. Why do I think I should speak openly on zoning at this time? A good leader must

not only enlighten and educate; he must also take positions, comfortable or not, on what he

believes in. That position may not be popular, but those who hide from the truth for the sake

of political correctness are not fit to lead., By this public statement, I am further addressing

this horrible misguidance, not only as an issue in my state but one which currently threatens

our nation.
I will narrow my presentation to four main areas, namely:

· The danger of zoning;
· How zoning encourages rigging and other electoral malpractices;

· Why zoning promotes mediocrity in governance and underdevelopment for the nation

and; How it causes disunity.
Zoning is a Dangerous Political Formula
Zoning is a prescription that kills instead of heals. Our nation, Nigeria, almost fell off the cliff

some weeks ago, but for a quick tweaking of the law by the legislature, after a stubborn

refusal to ensure a smooth transition of presidential powers that the constitution guarantees

by those who maintain, in the ruling party, that power is zoned to President Umaru Yar'Adua'

s region of birth. These people maintain that power must not change hands even if the

nation stands at the precipice of failure. The huge hurricane that just missed Nigeria by the

whiskers serves as a warning to people of good conscience to confront the problem now

before it consumes the nation. Permit me to go back the memory lane to recall how zoning

killed our second democratic experience.
In the Second Republic, there was a gentlemanly agreement within the National Party of

Nigeria (NPN) that when the term of President Shehu Shagari expired, power would travel

from the North to the West. The intention was to ensure a kind of 'Federal Character,' a

supposedly equitable sharing of power among the geographic components of the party.

Chief M. K. O. Abiola, who was eagerly expecting the zoning windfall to fall his way, was a

major financial sponsor of the party. He supported Alhaji Shehu Shagari not because of his

vision, wisdom, love of the nation and ability to govern. Chief M. K. O, Abiola was not only

denied this zoning windfall, he was humiliated by Umaru Dikko, who claimed the presidency

was not for the highest bidder. Feeling cheated, Abiola moved against those who used

zoning to bait and punish him. He left the party and opposed the Shagari administration.

Consequently, the military snuffed life out of democracy. In 1983, zoning not only failed as a

principle of equity, it contributed to the death of the Second Republic. Those who were

saying 'North today, South tomorrow' benefited but the rest of us suffered.

Zoning, which is some kind of “Federal Character”, is being pushed by the same people who

are now against Federal Character. Today, Mr. David Mark, the Senate President and

General Ibrahim Babangida are calling for the abrogation of “Federal Character.” What a

paradox? The self-confusion and internal conflict among the leadership of the PDP should

tell the nation that zoning is nothing but a self-serving solution whose beneficiaries are its

Suffice to say that General Muhammad Buhari, a Northerner, who emerged as the Head of

State picked General Tunde Idiagbon, also a Northerner, since by their geographic design,

Kwara State is also part of the North. While their administration erred in certain area of

respect of human rights and governance, Nigeria somehow accidentally benefited because

our currency was stronger than what it was under Shagari's administration, our debt was

reduced and certain sanity was restored in our political life and the country's economy. This

combination of leadership from the same part of the country provided a focused, serious

and, without doubt, disciplined administration which performed palpably better than the

shared ones before and after it. At the time of the Buhari-Idiagbon administration, we did not

have any cause to complain that the country was being governed by two Northerners and

two Muslims. We were happy with the result of good governance and that is what we should

continue to yearn for today.
While under Buhari-Idiagbon, regime zoning was ignored and a fair government resulted,

the pre-occupation with zoning long before then gave us problems. The zoning system was

the catalyst for Theophilus Danjuma, who shot and killed Major General Aguiyi Ironsi in 1966

to enable his zone to maintain power thus allowing Yakubu Gowon to mount the saddle of

governance on the back of regionalism. The bullet-riddled bodies of Ironsi and Adekunle

Fajuyi were later found in a nearby forest. So, how does zoning benefit our people, if at all?

Zoning always benefits the cabals. For example, forty four years after Danjuma came to

power, he told the nation that when he made five hundred million dollars from no-bids oil

contract from his former subordinate, Sani Abacha; he did not know what to do with the

money. Yet my fellow Jukun people and other indigenes of Taraba State have no access to

portable water, good schools and still sleep in darkness. As Plateau State is immersed in

rioting that has rendered thousands homeless, those who gained from zoning and amassed

vast wealth like Danjuma have not considered the plight of my people from that zone. Zoning

only matters when there is a need to gain power, not to help the people they had

represented. General Obasanjo who also benefited from zoning is the highest land owner in

Nigeria today. He introduced and entrenched the “do or die” electoral process because of

Former President Obasanjo admitted that in 1979, he instrumented the transfer of power to

the north to achieve an illegal wish that he later rationalized. One would have expected that

he would not repeat the same mistake he made in 1979. Well, oops, he did it again in 2007!

The General violated all the electoral laws when he picked, without restraint, Mr. Umaru Yar'

Adua to lead his political party and Nigeria on the basis of what zone of the nation he hailed

from. The effect of that arrangement was massive rigging of the election at all levels, which

the beneficiary, Yar'Adua admitted and promised to correct in future elections. Tied to

rigging were numerous litigation, political assassination, and colossal waste of money. It has

been proven time and again that the only way to enforce the zoning system is by rigging

elections, and rigging, we all know presents danger to our democracy and adulterates our

name in the committee of nations.
Once it is the turn of a zone to assume power, what follows is an overriding obligation to find

a visionless individual, to occupy the carved out post. The focus is on the rulers, not the

ruled, the elite, and not the masses. No one brought attention to this issue more than

Obasanjo, who famously said winning was a “do or die” affair in 2007. The PDP had to stay

in power by all means at various political levels because it staged unqualified and

unaccepted leaders in various places in enforcement of its zoning arrangement. The result

was the glorification of political savagery that brought mere thugs into national recognition.

I have decided to be analytical in this portion so that we can all see clearly how long each

“zone” has ruled Nigeria and the measure of benefit on the people of the zone and Nigerians

in general
#Name of President/Head of State Tenure Total Time

Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, October 1, 1960- January 15, 1966 5yrs. 3 months

General Yakubu Gowon August 1, 1966 – July 29, 1975 9 yrs

General Murtala Mohammed July 29, 1975 – February 13, 1976 6months

Alhaji Shehu Shagari October 1, 1979 – December 31, 1983 4years 3 months

General Muhammad Buhari December 31, 1983 – August 27, 1985 1yr. 8months

General Ibrahim Babangida August 27, 1985 – August 27, 1993 9yrs.

General Sani Abacha November 17, 1993 – June 8, 1998 4yrs. 7months

General Abdusalami Abubakar June 9, 1998 – May 29, 1999 11 months

Alhaji Umaru Yar'Adua May 29, 2007 – present 3yrs.

TOTAL YEARS IN THE NORTH 38 years, 2 months

Dr. Nnamdi Azikwe October 1, 1963 – January 16, 1966 2yrs. 3 months

Major-General Thomas Aguiyi-Ironsi January 16, 1966 – July 29, 1966 6 months

General Olusegun Obasanjo 13 February 1976 – 1 October 1979 3yrs. 7 months

Chief Ernest Shonekan August 26, 1993 -November 17, 1993 2months 18 days

General Olusegun Obasanjo May 29, 1999 - May 29, 2007 8yrs

TOTAL YEARS INTHE SOUTH 14years, 6 months

It is tragic that while the North has occupied the presidential office for 38 years, there is little

gain to my fellow northerners. With all sense of modesty and decorum, I contend that the

northern Nigeria has been worse than the south. Power did not automatically translate into

development. What power did was to enrich a few in the elite group, who have, in turn, used

the power to further enrich themselves and their offspring. Examined from all angles –

security, education, economy, public utilities, health, and transportation, among others- we

can hardly claim that the north has made any substantial progress over the other parts of

the country. This, my friends, is the sad story of zoning. With over 38 years in power,

General Babangida had to take his wife to a hospital in California, where she died. With

over 38 years in power, an Air Ambulance has to transport Ya'Adua back from Saudi Arabia

after he sought wellness around the globe for years. When President Yar'Adua appointed

his closest confidants and their cohorts to occupy the Central Bank, Ministry of Finance,

NNPC, Defense, agriculture and other important public offices, some Southerners kicked

against the trend. In parenthesis, the Southerners who complained forgot that there were

Southerners in the National Assembly who approved the appointment, and instead of

pointing to Nigerians, they pointed to the North because we did not see ourselves as one.

We have to realize that the appointment of mediocre persons to fill these positions is a main

problem of zoning. The sense among the Yar'Adua clan is that this is their time, and they

must make the most of every opportunity. They feel if they fail to “eat”now, the prospect will

soon pass. Zoning places a burden on the beneficiary to use his allocated time to place

his/her own people in strategic positions because the wait will be long for another

opportunity to come.
Nations all over the world look to bring out the best among its people to hold office so that

the fullness of its potentials can be released to address problems and opportunities that

politicians have to resolve or ripen. Mature democracies ensure that while universal

representation is achieved through geographic delimitation, leadership opportunities are not

restricted to carved-out zones that are not spelled out in the constitution. Their political

parties never attempt to stifle the law by introducing zoning of political offices that stop

people from seeking elective offices at a particular time. Zoning limits the choice of qualified

persons for political offices to a limited area; thereby sacrificing merit and quality. A

geographic limit our rulers impose is a limit on our potential for development and change.

This, I vehemently oppose! When a leader sees a problem he thinks he can resolve, and

offers his service to his people, it is a great disservice to block that vision on the platform of

arranged deals which are not sanctioned by the law or the citizens.

Currently, a political quagmire has resulted from the unconstitutional zoning of the

presidency by the ruling PDP to the North. When the PDP created what it regarded as a

“patriotic” zoning idea, it was myopic in that it did not anticipate incapacitation, infirmity or,

even, death of a president from a particular zone, which could compel the vice president to

assume the duty of the president. With the Acting President Goodluck Jonathan looking

good to extend his assumption of presidential powers, the Yar'Adua camp and the north are

already claiming rights to eight years of ruling, irrespective of the peaceful transition and the

constitutional role of the acting president. In fact, some reports indicate that a few

northerners believe that if a non-northerner with good programs contests on the platform of

other political party he should not receive the support of the north as a block. If Nigerians

appreciate the programs of such a Southerner contesting on the platform of another political

party and overwhelmingly vote for him, the only way to stop such a person will be by rigging.

This again would deepen disunity. The result will no longer qualify to be called democracy. If

this scenario becomes real, we can expect that assassination will intensify. It will further

embed in our political consciousness dichotomy between the zones and the problem of a

political party will become the problem of a nation.

Man proposes and God disposes. General Obasanjo recently said that it would not have

augured well for him as a Southerner to hand over to another Southerner, even if Nigerians

elected another Southerner (emphasis mine). Today, divine intervention has altered that

arrangement. The good luck of the Acting President Jonathan has handed over

presidential powers to the first Southern minority occupier of the seat, even if temporary,

who is the commander in chief of the armed forces as of today. Thus, God, in His infinite

wisdom, has registered his protest against the zoning system that only benefits the powerful,

the rich and divides His people – Nigerians.
As it is in the nation, so it is in Ogun State and other parts of the country. I am bold to say

that there are absolutely no developmental challenges faced by my brethrens from Yewa

that Egun, Ijebus, Aworis or Egbas are not equally experiencing. This is despite the fact a

Yewa is now the deputy governor and Yewas are at the State House of Assembly, and are

all colluding to oppress the masses. As a matter of fact, even as the current governor

claimed to be from Remo, the great majority of political assassinations and threats of

assassination during his tenure affected the Ijebus, more than any other intra-ethnic

grouping. Although Gbenga Daniel claims to be an indigene of Sagamu to secure the PDP

gubernatorial ticket, it is now the headquarters of cultism. It is clear then that zoning is

about the interest of those in power and not the interest of the people. Today, the Egbas

have no access to pipe-borne water, electricity, sound healthcare system, good education

system, just like other sections of the state, despite the fact we have had my people from

Egba in government.
Our system of government in Nigeria today is representative democracy with separation of

powers that allow citizens to delegate power to their supposedly elected officials. Every ward

is represented in a constituency, every constituency is represented in the local government,

every local government is represented in the state government and every state is

represented at the federal level. This is the constitutional guarantee for representation. It is

not by zoning. If zoning were beneficial, it would have been injected in the Constitution. The

Chairman of Odeda Local Government for example, is not from Sagamu. If he performs well,

he would have established records to use as a leverage to contest for a higher office. This

is what democracy is designed to achieve.
Representation starts from the grassroots to the top, and decision making is not just at the

top. If Ogun State will have the best government, our people will help themselves to pick the

best candidates from the ward level, all the way to the federal level without reference to

ethnics and religion. Each political office should be reserved for the best, including the

governorship. Meaningful change will come only when we entrust power to those we can

vouch for, not only as president or governor, but also as lawmakers and local government

helmsmen. This is how it has worked in the ancient democracies and this is how it should

work for us Nigerians. The governor of Ogun State has the whole state as his constituency.

The governor's allegiance and interest in the development of the whole state cannot be

zoned, so why should his election be zoned?
It is my belief that the zoning question needs to be addressed sufficiently because of the

way selfish politicians have been programming Nigerians to see it as the way out of

equitable representation. Genuine democracy does not limit contestants to area of birth

within a local, state, nation or region. My belief in fair play, equity and justice revolves

around allowing any indigene of any part of Nigeria, as long as that person is constitutionally

qualified, to contest and let the people decide. If we claim that someone from a geographic

area has already benefited from illegal means of acquiring power, and therefore, no one

from that area should contest again for the next eight years, the basic tenet of democracy is

inherently and irreparably damaged. In short, that is insanity, unfairness, inequity and

corrosive injustice - not democracy but an adulteration of it.

I am about the unity and an indivisible state under one nation. If someone from Sagamu is

in a state of coma, and someone from Abeokuta has tried before and he could not bring that

person back to life, and yet another person from Abeokuta has the magic wand to help

resuscitate the dying Sagamu person, it would be plain stupidity to say “no” to the person

with ability. That sick person will just suffer untimely death rather than get the needed lifeline

help. Elections should be based on ability to deliver service and democracy is about letting

the people decide. Further, only hungry and visionless leaders who are out for selfish

political ambition campaign on the basis of ethnicity, division or tribal sentiments. Many of

our political elite now send their offspring to study and live in the advanced nations such as

United States, Canada, England and Germany. They fail to realize that these nations were

not built on political zoning. The leaders in those countries follow their constitutions, not

parochial party formulas that serve the few. They seek the best to lead. Nigerian rulers

enjoy what they would not offer to their own people in these civilized countries. We should

stop them. The dream of people everywhere, whether it is in the United States or Nigeria, is

the same – to live a good life, exercise freedom and get justice. We need leaders with good

vision, who can make this dream a reality. When a governor or president is elected, his

activities affect all his or her constituents. Should I become governor of Ogun State, the

entire 20 local governments and 236 wards become my constituency. I will be required to

swear an oath of office to care for Ogun State and not my so-called zone, because one day,

after leaving power, I will have cause to travel to other parts of the State for functions. I also

do not have control over where my children travel to within the state which makes it a must

for me to treat the entire state as my constituents.

Zoning has always been used by the ruling parties in Nigeria as a way of holding the loyalty

of minorities and the less-satisfied – a bait for the fish that otherwise would have sought

deeper waters for its survival. The dangers of this practice at all levels of political

administration are many. This is why, I have decided to bring the issue of zoning to the fore

and address it sufficiently, not only for my constituents but for the nation in general. It is an

important matter that could affect the health of our budding democracy, the overall

development of our nation, and the sanity of our society. With the experience we are going

through from once an “offshore” president, there is no better time for people of goodwill and

patriots to carefully and intelligently weigh the problems with this practice

I strongly believe that zoning enhances division rather than foster unity. It divides Nigeria

into regions and tribes, and focuses on our differences. In a nation, zoning focuses on the

regions; in a state it brings out the units; old affiliations and dialectic problems; in a city,

deep-seething and unresolved disagreements. If we want to build unity, we will wisely do

away with cutting our nation up into fragments that bring division and enhance our

If those destroying Nigeria want to bend on North/South dichotomy, then let them issue me a

Southern Nigerian passport so that I know that I am not totally a Nigerian.

Lanre Banjo
Ogun State Governorship Candidate of the NCP in 2003 and

| Article source