Fg Lawyer Says He’s Not Prepared For Saraki’s Trial
SAN FRANCISCO, September 28, (THEWILL) – The trial of the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, and others for the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Rules 2015 was on Wednesday stalled owing to the prosecution counsel, Aliyu Umar's disclosure that he had not prepared his response to a fresh motion by the defendants challenging the jurisdiction of the court.
Saraki, Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, former Clerk of the National Assembly, Salisu Maikasuwa, and his deputy, Benedict Efeturi, are being prosecuted by Umar on behalf of the Attorney General of the Federal, Abubakar Malami for alleged forgery of the document used to elect them as leaders of the Senate in June 2015.
The matter, which was adjourned in July till September 28 following the annual vacation of the judiciary, resumed on Wednesday with Umar informing the court that he had just received a motion from the defendants challenging the jurisdiction of the court in respect of the charges against them and asking that the case be dismissed.
He harped on the need for him to properly prepare his response to the motion, since the matter has to do with the fundamental right of parties to fair hearing.
According to the prosecution counsel, “Just now I became aware of a motion by the first defendant and served on us on September 26. The motion is fundamental because it is asking your lordship to decline jurisdiction and quash the charges. It is a short notice.
“I have not filed anything. It is fundamental to fair hearing. Under the circumstances, I will ask for an adjournment to enable me to respond to the motion.
“Honestly, I'm not ready for this motion. If it is only just two days, grant us the adjournment to respond to the motion,” he said, pointing out that before responding to the motion, he had some internal issues he needed to attend to.
However, counsels to the defendants objected the application for adjournment. Counsel to Saraki, Paul Erokoro, asked the court to refuse application, describing it as lacking in merit.
“On behalf of the third defendant I submit that the application has no merit. If the Attorney-General has not deemed it fit to pass the entire case file to the counsel, then we should be allowed to move our motion. We are ready to proceed,” he said.
For the counsel to Efeturi, Mahmud Magaji, “The act of prosecution is serious business, especially in a criminal charge. The office of the Attorney-General which is the chief prosecuting counsel was served months ago. They had all the opportunities to respond to our applications.
“I urge your lordship not to allow us to descend to the internal working of the prosecution. In view of this, I'm objecting to the application for adjournment.”
The presiding judge, Yusuf Haliru, however adjourned the matter till October 7.